Evaluation of Input, Process, and Outputs of Ma’had Ali Program in Islamic Boarding School


Ma'had Ali
Countenance stake

How to Cite

Fadil, F. (2020). Evaluation of Input, Process, and Outputs of Ma’had Ali Program in Islamic Boarding School. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2020.8.1.119-138


Evaluation research aimed at determining the condition of input, process, and output.  evaluation of Input is evaluation of conditions before the Ma'had Ali program was carried out. Process, evaluation of the program management process. Output of the Ma’had Ali Program, at this stage evaluation will be carried out on graduates. Its evaluation model was a countenance stake. The methods were used such as interviews, observation, questionnaires and assessment sheets that are structured for managers, students, lecturers, and alumni. The conclusions of this study were the evaluation of whole input components was in a bad category because the respondents who answered very good and good category were only 50.9% of 100%. Whereas, the evaluation of process components was in a good category because the frequency of very good and good category was 77.17% of 100%, While, the evaluation of the overall output component is in bad category because the frequency of very good and good category was 73.6% of 34 graduates who answered the questionnaire. This shows that the overall output of the Ma’had Ali program has not reached the standard of a successful program.



Adab, Fakultas, Iain Sulthan, and Thaha Saifuddin. ‘Konstribusi Ma ’ Had Aly Terhadap’, 27 (2012): 231–54

Arifin, I. Kepemimpinan Kyai: Kasus Pondok Pesantren Tebuireng (Kalimasahada Press, 1993) , https://books.google.co.id/books?id=h9cxAAAAMAAJ.

Cohen, Geoffrey L., Julio Garcia, Valerie Purdie-Vaughns, Nancy Apfel, and Patricia Brzustoski. ‘Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap’, Science, 324 (2009): 400–403, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170769.

Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. ‘Tradisi Pesantren, Cet’, VI, Jakarta: LP3ES, 1994.

Fitzpatrick, Jody L. ‘Commentary-Collaborative Evaluation within the Larger Evaluation Context’, Evaluation and Program Planning, 35 (2012), 558–63 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.012.

Gazali, Hatim, and Abd. Malik. ‘Pesantren and the Freedom of Thinking: Study of Ma‘had Aly Pesantren Sukorejo Situbondo, East Java, Indonesia’, Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 47 (2009): 295, https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2009.472.295-316.

Griffin, P E, and P Nix. Educational Assessment and Reporting: A New Approach (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1991), https://books.google.co.id/books?id=3E4AAQAACAAJ.

Hatim Gazali, Abd. Malik. ‘Pesantren and the Freedom of Thinking Pesantren and the Freedom of Thinking’, Journal of Al-Jami’ah

Huberman, Michael, and Pat Cox. ‘Evaluation Utilization: Building Links between Action and Reflection’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16 (1990), 157–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80077-X.

Kementerian Agama RI. ‘Peraturan Menteri Agama RI No. 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pendidikan Keagamaan Islam’, 2014

Mastuhu. Dinamika Sistem Pendidikan Pesantren : Suatu Kajian Tentang Unsur Dan Nilai Sistem Pendidikan Pesantren, Volume 20. Jakarta: INIS, 2013.

Qomar, M. Pesantren: Dari Transformasi Metodologi Menuju Demokratisasi Institusi. Erlangga, https://books.google.co.id/books?id=_u6ouXge9JcC.

Stake, Robert E. ‘Excerpts from : “ Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation"’, 1983.

The author has full rights to the articles that has been sent to Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. The author is responsible for the originality of the articles and all the references used in the journal script.


Download data is not yet available.