KETIDAKPATUHAN PEMERINTAH TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN SEBAGAI IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 24/PUU-XV/2017
pdf

Keywords

Verdict, Constitution, Minister, Court

How to Cite

Mahardika, A., & Anifah, M. (2021). KETIDAKPATUHAN PEMERINTAH TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN SEBAGAI IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 24/PUU-XV/2017. Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan, 1(2), 1-20. Retrieved from http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/legacy/article/view/4713

Abstract

The verdict of the Constitutional Court Number 24 / PUU-XV / 2017 which rejects the petition for judicial review Article 33 of Law Number 2 Year 2011 on Amendments to Law Number 2 of 2008 on Political Parties presents problems in the Indonesian constitutional system. The Constitutional Court as a constitution escort institution is seen as justifying the actions of the government that interpret the norms in this law subjectively. The ambiguity of this article causes the Government to be reluctant to execute court decisions that have permanent legal force. Indirectly, that’s decision make Djan Faridz's constitutional rights lost. This is because even though there have been several court decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewisjde), Djan Fraidz still has not received approval from the government. This condition is due to the Minister of Law and Human Rights interpreting subjectively the provisions in Article 33 which regulate internal party political disputes and in the norm stated that the Court's decision is the final decision and there is no dictum requiring the Minister to ratify the results of court decisions.

 

pdf

References

Ahsin Thohari, Ahmad.(2004). Komisi Yudisial dan Reformasi Peradilan. Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat, Jakarta.

Bambang Widjojanto,. Negara Hukum, Kekuasaan Kehakiman: Upaya Membangun Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman, disampaikan pada Pelatihan Hak Asasi Manusia untuk Jejaring Komisi Yudisial RI diselenggarakan oleh Pusham UII, bekerjasama dengan Komisi Yudisial RI dan NCHR, di Bandung 30 Juni -3 Juli 2010.

Budi Suhariyanto, “Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Agung”, Jurnal Konstitusi, 13, No.1(2016) : 172-190

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “The Dissolution of Political Parties in Indonesia: Lessons Learned From The European Court of Human Rights”, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues; Arden, 22, Iss. 4 (2019) : 1-10.

Hart Ely, John.(1980). Democracy and Distrust A Theory of Judicial Review, Harvard University Press, Massachusets.

Hill, B Jessie, “Resistance to Constitutional Theory: The Supreme Court, Constitutional Change, and the Pragmatic Moment", Texas Law Review; Austin, Vol. 91, Iss. 7, 2013, h. 1815-1842.

Ibrahim, Johni (2007), Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.

Korycka-Zirk, Milena, “The Reinterpretation Of The Notion Constitutionalism ”, Contemporary Legal and Economic Issues; Osijek, 5 (2015) : 85-96.

Lotulung, Paulus Efendi.(2013), Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan, Salemba Humanika, Jakarta.

M. Syukri, Azhari Yahya, dan Iman Jauhari, “Eksekusi Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Dalam Perkara Faraid Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho”, Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 2, no.3, (2018) : 471-484

Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora, “Implikasi Omnibus Law Terhadap Hak Konstitusional Atas Lingkungan Hidup Yang Sehat”, Jurnal Konstitusi, 18, no.1 (2020):195-218

__________________________, “The Officer Compliance of Interlocutory Decisions of The Administrative Court (The Study of Golkar Party and Persatuan Pembangunan Party)”, Adjudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4, no.1 (2020):1-14.

__________________________, “Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Internal Partai Politik Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia”, Legacy : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan, 1, no.1 (2021) : 69-95

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (1985), Hukum Acara Perdata, Liberty,Yogyakarta.

Nardi, Dominic J, “Can NGOs Change the Constitution? Civil Society and the Indonesian Constitutional Court”, Contemporary Southeast Asia; Singapore, 40, Iss. 2 (2018) : 247-278

Safta, Lecturer Marieta, “Developments In The Constitutional Review. Constitutional Court Between The Status of Negative Legislator and The Status of Positive Co-Legislator, ."Perspectives of Business Law" Journal Bucharest, 1, Iss. 1 (2012) : 1-20.

Soemantri M, Sri.(1992), Bunga Rampai Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung.

Rest, Alfred, “State Responsibility / Liability - Erga Omnes Obligations and Judicial Control”, Environmental Policy and Law; Amsterdam, 40, Iss. 6 (2010) : 298-307.

Sukmariningsih and Retno Mawarini, “Some Key Issues In The Cancellation Of Local Regulations In Indonesia”, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues; Arden, 22, Iss. 1 (2019) : 1-6

Syukri Asy’ari, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hiplito, Mohammad Mahrus Ali, Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012), Jurnal Konstitusi, 10, no. 4, (2013): 679

Van Biezen, Ingrid. “State Intervention in Party Politics: The Public Funding and Regulation of Political Parties”, European Review; Cambridge, 16, Iss. 3, (2008) : 337-353

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.