MAPPING THE IDEOLOGY OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION CONSIDERATIONS
PDF

Keywords

Ideology, Power Relations, President, Independence of Judges, Constitutional Court

How to Cite

Munawir, Y., Mahardhika, A., & Nasution, A. (2024). MAPPING THE IDEOLOGY OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION CONSIDERATIONS. Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 24(02), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2024.24.02.299-314

Abstract

The power relations between state institutions can be influenced by the state institutions that propose them, such as the appointment of United States judges who have ideological tendencies that are identical to the president. This study attempts to determine the ideology of constitutional judges and the political ideology of the President of the Republic of Indonesia through an analysis of the considerations of decisions and political parties. Is there a relationship between the political ideology of the president and constitutional judges in the consideration of decisions in judicial review cases? The design of this research is library research with a conceptual, legislative, and case study approach. Qualitative data analysis in the form of copies of Constitutional Court decisions supported by a study of related theoretical literature. The results of the study indicate that the ideology of constitutional judges seen from the considerations of their decisions is mostly moderate, although some considerations tend to be secular and Islamic. The political ideology of the president based on the ideology of the political parties supporting President Megawati and President Jokowi tends to be secular, while President Yudhoyono is nationalist-religious. The ideological relationship of constitutional judges proposed by the president is identical to the political ideology of President Megawati. Meanwhile, during the era of President Yudhoyono and President Jokowi, the ideology of constitutional judges in the consideration of their decisions was not identical to the ideology of the president's political party. This shows the independence of judges from the influence of the current political ruling ideology.

https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2024.24.02.299-314
PDF

References

Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 12, no. 2, 2015, 218-236. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1222.
Amnesty International, Prosecuting Beliefs: Indonesia’s Blasphemy Laws, London: Amnesty International, 2014.
Anshari, Endang Saifudin Piagam Jakarta 22 Juni 1945: Sebuah Konsensus Nasional Tentang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia (1945-1959), Depok: Gema Insani, 1997.
Bourchier, David M. “Two Decades of Ideological Contestation in Indonesia: From Democratic Cosmopolitanism to Religious Nationalism,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 49, no. 5, 2019, 713-733, https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620
Bourchier, David, and Vedi R. Hadiz (ed), Indonesian Politics and Society: A Reader, London: Routledge Curzon, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203987728
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Constitutional Judge, (20 January 2024), https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.HakimSebelumnya&id=3&menu=3 (accessed 21 April 2024).
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decisions in 2003-2009.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decisions in 2018-2023.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, “Saldi Isra Terpilih Jadi Wakil Ketua MK 2023-2028” (13 March 2023), https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/03/15/15203741/saldi-isra-terpilih-jadi-wakil-ketua-mk-2023-2028 (accessed 20 April 2023).
Cross, Frank B. “Collegial Ideology In The Courts”, Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 103, iss. 3, 2009, 1399-1426, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292632511_Collegial_ideology_in_the_courts
Democratic Party, Articles of Association and Bylaws 2015.
Fossati, Diego, “The Resurgence Of Ideology In Indonesia: Political Islam, Aliran and Political Behaviour”, Journal Of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, vol. 38, iss. 2, 2019, 119–148. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1868103419868400
Freeden, Michael “Ideology and Political Theory,” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 1, Februari 2006, 3-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310500395834
Herdiansah, Ari Ganjar, “Politisasi Identitas Dalam Kompetisi Pemilu di Indonesia Pasca 2014,” Jurnal Bawaslu, vol. 3, no. 2, 2017, 169-183. https://bawaslu.go.id/id/publikasi/jurnal-bawaslu-vol-3-no-2-politisasi-identitas-dalam-kompetisi-pemilu-di-indonesia-pasca
Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), Articles of Association and Bylaws 2015-2020.
Kang, Michael S. dan Joanna M Shepherd, “The Long Shadow of Bush v. Gore: Judicial Partisanship in Election Cases”, Stanford Law Review; Stanford, vol. 68, iss. 6, 2016, 1411-1452. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/06/5-Kang-Stan._L._Rev.pdf
Kantorowicz, Jarosław dan Nuno Garoupa, ”An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in The Polish Constitutional Tribunal, 2003–2014”, Constitutional Political Economy; New York, vol. 27, iss. 1, 2016, 66-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9200-8
Kartika, Shanti Dwi. “Seleksi Untuk Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi,” Majalah Info Singkat Hukum, vol. 9, no. 6, Maret 2017, Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI, Jakarta 2017.
King, Dwight Y. Half-hearted Reform: Electoral Institutions and the Struggle for Democracy in Indonesia. Portsmouth: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003.
Lee, Youngjae. “Reasonable Doubt and Disagreement”, Legal Theory; Cambridge, vol. 23, iss. 4, 2017, 203-257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325217000180
Martin, John Levi “What is Ideology?”, Sosiologia: Problema e Praticas, no. 77, 2015, 9-31, https://doi.org/10.7458/SPP2015776220
Maruarar Siahaan, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Munawir, Yusron. Problematik Pelaksanaan Hak Prerogatif Presiden Dalam Perombakan Kabinet Indonesia Bersatu II. Diss. Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2013.
Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.
Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court.
Reyes, René dan Jessica W Reyes, “Religion In Judicial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis”, Brigham Young University Law Review; Provo, vol. 2019, iss. 1, 2019, 293-337. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2019/iss1/9
Singh, Bilveer. “The 2004 Presidential Elections in Indonesia: Much Ado about Nothing?” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 25, no. 3, December 2003, 431-448. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25798656
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Sujito, Arie, “Pancasila Dan Politik Emansipasi: Problematisasi Politik Identitas Menuju Pemilu 2024,” Jurnal Pancasila, vol. 3, no. 2, 2022, 11-32. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/pancasila/article/view/79923
Syamsudin, M. “Rekonstruksi Perilaku Etik Hakim dalam Menangani Perkara Berbasis Hukum,” Jurnal Hukum: IUS QUIA IUSTUM, vol. 18, October 2011, 127-145. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/7236
Syaputra, Muhammad Yusrizal Adi, “Koalisi Partai Politik di Kabinet: Antara Penguatan Lembaga Kepresdinan atau Politik Balas Budi,” Udayana Magister Law Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, May 2020, 111-131. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i01.p08
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.